Take It Off Boys, the Ladies Are Watching
Why We Objectify Men Here at FemdomU
Let’s get something straight from the beginning: we objectify men here at FemdomU, and we have an absolutely wonderful time doing it. Objectification, in the context of consensual Femdom, means deliberately treating a submissive man as something to be looked at, posed, evaluated, displayed, decorated, teased, or used for a woman’s amusement. Male objectification deliberately turns the traditional sexual gaze around. Instead of women being expected to display themselves for male consumption, our submissive men step forward and become the bodies on display, while the women decide what we want to see.
That distinction matters to me because FemdomU was never created to be another adult website where women exist primarily to provide sexual entertainment for men. Our Staff and Guest Dommes are the authority figures here. We teach, write, create, direct, experiment, and sometimes entertain ourselves at the expense of willing submissive men. The men who volunteer to model for us understand that when they step in front of the camera, they are offering themselves for female creativity, amusement, education, and judgment. Sometimes the result is sexy, sometimes it makes a serious point, and sometimes we simply think it would be hilarious to make a naked man stand in a ridiculous pose.
Turning the Camera Around
Traditional adult media has spent decades teaching audiences that women are supposed to be the objects and men are supposed to be the consumers. Even plenty of supposedly Femdom-oriented material follows essentially the same formula. Put a beautiful woman in fetish clothing, point the camera at her, and construct the entire presentation around what a male viewer wants to see. She may be holding the whip, but the man watching is still the customer being catered to.
We decided to turn the camera around. At FemdomU, our ladies do not need to strip for the audience because we have boys for that. Our submissive models provide the bodies. They are the ones who get posed, inspected, decorated, exposed, evaluated, and displayed. Instead of asking what our male readers want a Domme to wear, we can ask a much more entertaining question: what would our Dommes like to make the men do?
That is one of the privileges of being a Staff or Guest Domme at FemdomU. We have a growing collection of willing male models who have volunteered to let women play with their presentation. A Domme can decide that she wants a man kneeling, standing, facing away from the camera, displaying a message across his chest, wearing something she selected, holding a particular prop, or recreating some wonderfully absurd idea she dreamed up over her morning coffee. Within the boundaries of our modeling program, she gets to be the creative authority and he gets to figure out how to give her the image she requested.
The Male Body Becomes Our Playground
One of my favorite parts of our modeling program is watching what happens when different women are given access to the same group of men. We do not all see them the same way, which means the assignments can vary wildly depending on which woman is issuing the instructions. One Domme might immediately imagine a serious submissive portrait, while another sees a perfectly useful billboard and wants words written across his body. Someone else may look at the same man and decide his backside would make an excellent component in a visual joke.
That variety is part of what makes the project so much fun. Sometimes the goal is erotic, sometimes it is educational, sometimes it involves embarrassment or vulnerability, and sometimes it is simply ridiculous. Our Staff and Guest Dommes have different personalities, interests, senses of humor, and approaches to Female Domination, and their modeling ideas naturally reflect those differences. Give ten dominant women access to the same naked man and you should not be surprised when they come up with ten very different things to do with him.
The common denominator is that the woman decides how she wants him presented. The model is not necessarily taking the photograph that he believes makes him look the most handsome, masculine, impressive, or sexy. He is taking the photograph she requested. He may prefer one angle, one pose, or one particular presentation of his body, but if the Domme directing the project wants something completely different, then her vision takes priority within the limits he established when he volunteered.
That is objectification with a Femdom purpose. The submissive man gives up a measure of control over his own presentation and accepts that his body has temporarily become material for a woman’s idea. For a model who genuinely enjoys submission, that surrender can be much more meaningful than simply taking another attractive nude photograph of himself.
Yes, the Boys Enjoy It Too
Objectification in a consensual Femdom environment does not mean disregarding the person inside the object. Our models volunteer because many of them genuinely enjoy being used this way, although their reasons are not necessarily identical. Some love exhibitionism and the thrill of being seen. Others enjoy embarrassment, following detailed instructions from women, or knowing that their body has become useful to a Domme and her project.
There is also something wonderfully vulnerable about submitting a photograph and knowing that a group of dominant women will eventually be looking at it. They might compliment him, laugh at him, critique his pose, decide that he could have done better, or use his photograph as inspiration for another idea. Once he submits the image, he no longer controls their reaction, and that uncertainty is precisely what makes the experience exciting for many submissive men.
I think that is an important distinction between ordinary exhibitionism and submissive modeling. He is not merely saying, “Look at me.” He is saying, “You told me how you wanted to see me, and this is what I produced for you.” The focus shifts away from his desire for attention and toward his willingness to satisfy female direction. He gets to be seen without necessarily being in charge of how he is seen.
Our Models Serve the Educational Matriarchy
There is another reason male objectification fits FemdomU so well. Our modeling program gives us an enormous visual resource for illustrating the Femdom lifestyle without making our women responsible for constantly supplying the imagery. If we want to demonstrate a submissive position, illustrate an article about body writing, show an example of CFNM, explore humiliation or exhibitionism, or create something entertaining for our readers, we have volunteers willing to become part of that content.
The male body becomes an educational prop, and I know some of our boys will get a little thrill just reading that description. It is deliberately objectifying, but the human being attached to that body volunteered to participate. He knows what our modeling program involves, establishes his boundaries, and chooses to make himself available to women who can turn his submission into something useful for thousands of FemdomU readers.
That is service, and service does not always need to involve something grand or difficult. Sometimes a submissive contributes by writing an insightful article about his experiences. Sometimes he helps behind the scenes. Sometimes he can contribute simply by taking off his clothes, following a woman’s directions, positioning his body exactly where she told him, and taking the photograph she asked for. If the resulting image helps one of our Dommes illustrate an idea, entertain our audience, or simply enjoy herself, then he has made himself useful.
The Summer DomU Games Take It Even Further
If you want to see this philosophy in action, look no further than the Summer DomU Games currently underway. We designed the Games to give our ladies an opportunity to create their own modeling challenges, and they have embraced that opportunity with considerably more enthusiasm than some of our poor models may have anticipated. Each participating Domme determines what she wants to see and then sends the boys off to produce it.
We are well into the Games now, and the numbers are becoming impressive. So far, we have already collected more than 50 photographs from nine different models participating across eight challenges. That represents dozens of individual acts of submission, creativity, exhibitionism, and occasionally very good-natured embarrassment, all generated because our ladies decided they wanted to see something and our boys volunteered to provide it.
Best of all, the ladies are not finished issuing their challenges yet. More assignments are still coming, which means our models cannot quite relax and congratulate themselves on surviving the summer. There are still Dommes with ideas, and I have learned that giving our women permission to invent things for naked submissive men to do tends to produce more ideas, not fewer.
Every Domme Gets Her Turn
The structure of the Games gives each participating Domme considerable creative freedom. She determines the central challenge, describes the pose and presentation she expects, and can specify details about clothing or nudity, props, body writing, positioning, or other elements necessary to create her image. She can also add a bonus component that pushes the model beyond the ordinary challenge and rewards the boys willing to put in some extra effort.
Watching the photographs arrive has been tremendous fun because every challenge reveals something about the woman who created it. Our Dommes have different senses of humor, different interests, and very different ideas about what makes a submissive man useful in front of a camera. Some assignments are about presentation and discipline. Others lean into embarrassment, creativity, physical display, promotion of FemdomU, or simply the delightful absurdity of giving grown men strange instructions and knowing they will actually follow them.
For the models, that means adapting to different women rather than becoming comfortable with one predictable style of assignment. What satisfies one Domme may not impress another. One may care deeply about precision while another rewards creativity. One may want dignity and submission in the same photograph, while another might prefer to strip away every trace of dignity she can find. The model’s job is not to tell us which approach he prefers. His job is to read the instructions and serve the woman who issued them.
More Than 50 Photos and Counting
More than 50 photographs have already been submitted by nine men because a group of women told them how we wanted them to pose. I admit that number makes me smile every time I look at it. There is something wonderfully FemdomU about a submissive logging in, discovering that yet another woman has developed plans for his body, and realizing that he has another photograph to produce.
For the women, meanwhile, the Games give us permission to be creative and demanding. We can make the challenges serious, mischievous, sexy, educational, embarrassing, or completely ridiculous. We can challenge a model’s confidence and willingness to be seen. We can turn his chest into advertising space, make him demonstrate something for our readers, use his body to promote the Magazine, or turn him into the visual punchline of a joke that primarily amuses the women.
And before anyone feels too sorry for the boys, remember that they volunteered for this. They joined a Femdom magazine and told a collection of dominant women that they were willing to model for us. We are simply taking them at their word, perhaps with slightly more enthusiasm than they originally imagined.
The Galleries Begin This Week
The first Summer DomU Games challenges have now been completed, which means we will begin publishing the galleries this week. Readers will finally get to see what our ladies have been doing with these men and compare how different models responded to the same instructions. With more than 50 photographs already collected and additional challenges still underway, we have plenty to share.
I am particularly excited about this stage because publication completes the experience in a way that submitting the photograph alone cannot. Until now, much of the interaction has existed between the model, the Domme who issued the challenge, and the FemdomU team collecting the submissions. Once the galleries go live, the model becomes something our larger audience can observe, compare, appreciate, and perhaps laugh about a little.
The galleries also showcase the creativity of the women behind the camera instructions. Readers will see how differently our Dommes approach the same basic resource: a willing submissive man with a camera and instructions. The man may be the object appearing in the photograph, but the woman remains the creative force responsible for putting him there. That relationship between female imagination and male compliance is exactly what I want the DomU Games to celebrate.
A Privilege for Our Staff and Guest Dommes
I want our Guest Dommes in particular to understand that access to our modeling project is genuinely one of the privileges of contributing to FemdomU. Our models are a resource available to the women creating this Magazine. If you have an idea for a photograph, tell us. If you are writing something and think a submissive model could help illustrate it, ask. If you suddenly think of a pose that would make our boys nervous every time they open their dashboard, I definitely want to hear about it.
You do not need professional photography experience or an elaborate artistic concept. Some of the best ideas begin with a woman laughing and saying, “You know what I’d like to make them do?” That sentence has probably been responsible for more FemdomU modeling projects than any formal creative meeting we have ever held, and I hope it continues to be.
The men have volunteered because they want women to have ideas for them. They have offered us their time, their effort, their vulnerability, and, in the case of our modeling program, their bodies as creative material. Our Staff and Guest Dommes should feel absolutely entitled to make good use of that offer while respecting the boundaries under which it was given.
The Privilege of Being the Object
There is also a privilege on the submissive side of this equation because not every man gets to model for FemdomU. Our volunteers are contributing to something larger than their individual photographs. Their bodies help illustrate our articles, entertain our readers, inspire our Dommes, support our projects, and create original material for the Magazine. They are helping us build our Educational Matriarchy by accepting a deliberately subordinate position within it.
A good model learns to understand that distinction. He follows the instructions carefully, puts effort into his presentation, and accepts that the finished photograph belongs to a larger creative project. He is not the star demanding attention or dictating how the photograph should be used. He is the material our women are working with, and his satisfaction comes from knowing that he successfully gave us what we wanted.
That is why I consider modeling another form of submissive service rather than simply exhibitionism. Being looked at by our women is not something a volunteer is owed merely because he wants attention. It is an opportunity he receives because he has made himself useful, demonstrated that he can follow instructions, and given us a reason to keep finding new things for him to do.
The Women Direct and the Men Pose
FemdomU is supposed to turn familiar expectations upside down. Our women teach, direct, create, decide, and exercise authority. Our submissive men serve, contribute, follow instructions, and occasionally find themselves naked in front of a camera wondering exactly how their lives reached the point where a group of women is awarding points based on how well they followed an absurd set of posing instructions.
I think that is beautiful.
Male objectification gives us another way to explore Female Domination without reproducing the tired formula where women are expected to perform while men sit comfortably behind a screen consuming them. Here, the submissive can step into the vulnerable position. He can pose, blush, display himself, follow instructions, and wonder what the ladies are going to think when they finally see his photograph.
We will be happy to look. Judging from the 50-plus photographs already sitting in our Summer DomU Games collection, our boys seem remarkably happy to keep giving us something worth looking at, too. And with more challenges still to come, I suspect we are going to find plenty more ways to objectify them before summer is over.
FAQ
What does male objectification mean at FemdomU?
Male objectification means deliberately making the submissive male body the subject of display, posing, evaluation, and creative use. Within our consensual modeling program, volunteers allow our Dommes to determine how they will be presented for specific projects and challenges. It reverses the more familiar arrangement in which women are expected to provide the bodies being displayed.
Do FemdomU models consent to being objectified?
Yes. Participation in the modeling program is voluntary, and models maintain established boundaries. The objectification is part of a consensual Femdom dynamic in which submissive volunteers deliberately give our women a degree of creative control over how they are posed and presented.
Why does FemdomU feature male models instead of asking Dommes to pose?
It reflects our philosophy and the culture we are creating. Our dominant women are educators, writers, creators, and authority figures rather than performers obligated to provide sexualized imagery for male viewers. Using submissive male models deliberately reverses that traditional arrangement and gives our Dommes a visual resource for their own creative projects.
What are the Summer DomU Games?
The Summer DomU Games are a series of modeling challenges created by FemdomU Dommes. Each participating woman develops an assignment for the models, who then photograph themselves completing her instructions. More than 50 photographs from nine models across eight challenges have already been collected, with additional challenges still to come.
When will the Summer DomU Games galleries be published?
The first completed challenge galleries begin publishing this week. Additional galleries will follow as the remaining challenges are completed and submissions are collected.
Can FemdomU Guest Dommes create modeling projects?
Yes. Our male modeling pool is one of the creative resources available to participating Staff and Guest Dommes. They can propose poses, visual concepts, article illustrations, challenges, and other appropriate modeling assignments for FemdomU projects.
Can submissive men volunteer as models?
FemdomU accepts submissive volunteers interested in contributing to the Magazine, including men interested in participating in appropriate modeling projects. Applicants should understand that modeling is about following the creative direction of our Dommes and contributing something useful to FemdomU, rather than simply finding another place to post nude photographs.










I am a submissive male volunteers interested in contributing to the Magazine, including participating in appropriate modeling projects. I understand that modeling is about following the creative direction of the Dommes and contributing something useful to FemdomU, rather than simply finding another place to post nude photographs.
The men in these pictures and like pictures on this site are sending a personal message of their rejection of the traditional notion of male superiority over females and of their acceptance of and submission to female authority over them. Such photos effectively send that message, especially those with elements of corporal punishment. These males are also speaking for other males, myself included, who would, if they could, also be in such photos and say the same. Males should submit to female authority. The world would be a better place if they did.
All this raises some historical and theological issues. Pope John Paul II in his teachings Theology of the Body concluded from traditional Biblical sources that submission between the genders was mutual, not unilateral. He authoritatively overruled the historical basis of patriarchy. The Archbishop of Canterbury agrees. Disagreement comes largely from conservative Calvinist groups in America, continuing tradition rather than addressing the substance of texts.
Mutuality of submission does not require concurrency of it. Each form of submission has its proper occasion, as circumstances require, including sending messages that need to be sent. Western tradition, properly understood from primary sources, included male to female submission. The males in the photos are speaking for and following Western tradition, not the advocates of patriarchy who like to talk about traditional values. Those who regularly call in the public square for such submission, as this web site does, are advancing the common good.